PracticePanther
Legal practice management software for small firms, from $49 per user a month (Solo, annual), part of Paradigm.
- Paid plans
- Per user
- Cloud
- Small firms
- Independent sources
- Verified 11 Nov 2026Sources are dated on this profile
- 2 sourcesLinked, typed and dated
- Independent third-party sourcesHow this profile was compiled
- Not an endorsementStack18 has not tested this product
What is PracticePanther?
PracticePanther is legal practice management software with matters, time tracking, billing, PantherPayments and client portals for small firms.
- Best forSmall firms wanting quick setup and built-in payments
- Team size fitSmall teams, Mid-size teams
- PricingSolo $49; Essential $69; Business $89 per user a month (annual); monthly ~$10 more.
- Main limitationThinner reporting.
- AlternativesClio, MyCase, Rocket Matter · compare all
PracticePanther overview: who it is for and what it does.
PracticePanther covers matters, calendars, time tracking, billing and PantherPayments for card and eCheck.
A June 2026 guide lists Solo at $49, Essential $69 and Business $89 per user a month billed annually, with monthly billing about $10 more per user; CostBench lists the same prices.
It notes PracticePanther is part of Paradigm, is used in 170+ countries, and has thinner reporting and customisation than some rivals.
Main problem it solves
Gets small firms running fast.
Typical customer segment
Solo and small firms.
Target users
- Solo attorneys
- Small firms
- Billing staff
Primary use cases
- Time tracking
- Billing
- Payments
- Matters
What makes it distinct
- Fast setup.
- PantherPayments.
- Global use.
PracticePanther features explained.
Plans (per user per month, annual)
- Solo
- $49.
- Essential
- $69.
- Business
- $89.
Billing
- Monthly
- ~$10 more per user.
- Payments
- Card and eCheck.
- Countries
- 170+.
Limits
- Reporting
- Thinner.
- Customisation
- Thinner.
- Growth
- Some firms outgrow it.
PracticePanther pricing and plans.
Figures reported by independent sources; vendor page not reviewed directly. Checked 11 Nov 2026 against Dupple · CostBench.
Pricing model
Per user per month; annual cheaper.
Free plan
No
Free trial
Not documented
PracticePanther plans and prices (USD)
Solo
$49 per user per month
Annual
Solos.
Essential
$69 per user per month
Annual
Small firms.
Business
$89 per user per month
Annual
Growing firms.
Dupple (June 2026); CostBench (2026).
Prices change. Confirm current plans and terms on the vendor's site before you decide.
Visit official website (external) ↗See alternativesPracticePanther integrations, API and platforms.
Important integrations
- QuickBooks
- Xero
- Microsoft 365
- Zapier
Supported platforms
- Web
- iOS
- Android
API
Not reviewed for this profile.
Data import and export
Not reviewed for this profile.
Integration coverage was not assessed in full. Check PracticePanther's integrations directory and documentation for your tools.
PracticePanther pros and cons.
Strengths, limitations and best fit. Each point cites a source; editorial summaries are not customer reviews.
Best for
- Small firms wanting quick setup and built-in payments
- Solo attorneys
- International firms
May be less suited to
- Large firms
- Complex litigation workflows
Top PracticePanther alternatives and competitors.
Clio
Cloud law practice management software with 250+ integrations, from $49 per user a month (EasyStart…
Explore →Related productMyCase
Legal practice management software owned by AppFolio, with public pricing from $50 per user a month…
Explore →Related productRocket Matter
Legal practice management and billing software with LEDES and split billing, from $49 per user a month…
Explore →PracticePanther compared with similar law practice management software.
Summaries come from each profile. This is a side-by-side aid, not a ranking.
| Product | Pricing model | Starting price | Free trial | Firm size | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PracticePanther | Per user | $49/user/mo (annual) | Not documented | Solo-small | Quick setup |
| Actionstep | Quote | Quote | Not documented | Mid-large | Workflows |
| Clio | Per user | $49/user/mo (annual) | Not documented | Solo to large | Integrations |
| CosmoLex | Per user | $49/user/mo | Not documented | Small-mid | Built-in accounting |
| Filevine | Quote | ~$50/user/mo (est.) | Not documented | Mid-large | Litigation |
| Lawmatics | Quote | Quote | Not documented | 3+ users | Intake |
PracticePanther vs competitors: head-to-head comparisons.
Each comparison has a feature table, pricing side by side, strengths and limits, and best-fit scenarios.
Clio vs PracticePanther
Clio vs PracticePanther in 2026: pricing, free plans, features, strengths and best fit compared from dated…
Compare →ComparisonMyCase vs PracticePanther
MyCase vs PracticePanther in 2026: pricing, free plans, features, strengths and best fit compared from dated…
Compare →Compare PracticePanther with all its alternatives in one table →
PracticePanther discussions and buying questions.
No published discussions mention this product yet.
PracticePanther questions and answers
What is PracticePanther used for?
PracticePanther is legal practice management software with matters, time tracking, billing, PantherPayments and client portals for small firms. Typical uses include time tracking, billing, payments, matters.
How much does PracticePanther cost?
Solo is $49, Essential $69 and Business $89 per user a month billed annually.
Who owns PracticePanther?
It is part of Paradigm, per a June 2026 guide.
Does PracticePanther handle payments?
Yes, PantherPayments for card and eCheck.
How does PracticePanther compare with its competitors?
Stack18 publishes head-to-head comparisons of Clio vs PracticePanther and MyCase vs PracticePanther, each with a feature table, pricing and best-fit scenarios.
What are the main alternatives to PracticePanther?
The main alternatives to PracticePanther covered on Stack18 are Clio, MyCase and Rocket Matter. Clio may suit law firms wanting the broadest integration ecosystem. MyCase may suit small and mid-size firms wanting public pricing and payments. Rocket Matter may suit small firms with complex billing needs. See the PracticePanther alternatives guide for a side-by-side table.
What are the pros and cons of PracticePanther?
Strengths: Quick setup. Built-in PantherPayments. Limitations: Thinner reporting. Less customisation.
Who is PracticePanther best for?
PracticePanther may suit small firms wanting quick setup and built-in payments; solo attorneys; international firms. It may be less suited to large firms; complex litigation workflows.
What integrations does PracticePanther support?
Documented integrations and ecosystem items include QuickBooks, Xero, Microsoft 365, Zapier. API: Not reviewed for this profile.
When was the PracticePanther profile last verified?
Sources for this profile were last reviewed on 11 Nov 2026. 2 sources are listed under Sources, and prices and plans can change, so confirm with the vendor.
Where this information comes from.
- The Best Legal Practice Management Software in 2026 (prices as of June 2026) Dupple Third-party Accessed 11 Nov 2026
- Legal Practice Management Software Pricing 2026: 21 Tools CostBench Third-party Accessed 11 Nov 2026
Secondary-source profile. Vendor pages were not reviewed directly for this profile. Facts and prices are taken from independent third-party sources and may differ from the vendor's current pages. Confirm with the vendor before buying.
Pricing comes from the dated third-party sources listed; where sources differ both figures are shown. Confirm with the vendor before buying. Capabilities were not tested.
Stack18 has not tested this product or received anything from the vendor for this profile. Editorial summaries of vendor information are not endorsements. Confirm details with the vendor before buying.
Evaluating PracticePanther?
Check the vendor's current pricing and terms, compare it with similar products, or read how others approach the decision. If off-the-shelf is not the answer, Stack18 builds around how your business works.
Logos provided by Logo.dev. Product names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners and appear for identification only; they do not imply endorsement.