Ashby
An all-in-one ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics platform, with Foundations from about $400 a month for companies up to 100 employees.
- Size band
- Monthly or annual
- Cloud
- All-in-one
- Independent sources
- Verified 10 Nov 2026Sources are dated on this profile
- 2 sourcesLinked, typed and dated
- Independent third-party sourcesHow this profile was compiled
- Not an endorsementStack18 has not tested this product
What is Ashby?
Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform combining applicant tracking, CRM, interview scheduling and advanced analytics, popular with fast-growing tech companies.
- Best forFast-growing companies wanting ATS, CRM and analytics in one tool
- Team size fitSmall teams, Mid-size teams, Large enterprises
- PricingFoundations about $300-$900 a month (up to 100 employees); Plus and Enterprise quoted (typically $30,000-$120,000 a year).
- Main limitationLarger plans quote-only.
- AlternativesGreenhouse, Lever, Workable · compare all
Ashby overview: who it is for and what it does.
Ashby combines ATS, sourcing CRM, scheduling and analytics so recruiting teams avoid stitching tools together.
An August 2026 guide lists Foundations at $400 a month for up to 100 employees with a 10% annual discount, and Plus and Enterprise as custom, typically $30,000 to $120,000 a year for 100 to 500 employees.
A September 2026 competitor comparison gives Foundations as $300 to $900 a month by size, including 1,500 AI credits a month, with structured interview plans and API access on every tier.
Main problem it solves
Replaces multiple recruiting tools with one data-rich platform.
Typical customer segment
Startups through enterprises, especially tech.
Target users
- Recruiting operations
- Talent leaders
- Startup founders hiring
Primary use cases
- Applicant tracking
- Sourcing CRM
- Interview scheduling
- Recruiting analytics
What makes it distinct
- All-in-one platform.
- Advanced analytics.
- AI credits included.
Ashby features explained.
Plans
- Foundations
- $300 to $900 a month; up to 100 employees.
- Plus
- Quote.
- Enterprise
- Quote.
Included
- AI credits
- 1,500 a month on Foundations.
- Structured interviews
- All tiers.
- API
- All tiers.
Billing
- Terms
- Monthly or yearly.
- Annual discount
- 10%.
- Larger teams
- $30,000 to $120,000 a year typical.
Ashby pricing and plans.
Figures reported by independent sources; vendor page not reviewed directly. Checked 10 Nov 2026 against Rework · Yardstick.
Pricing model
Price by company size band; monthly or annual.
Free plan
No
Free trial
Not documented
Ashby plans and prices (USD)
Foundations
From about $300-$400 per month
Monthly or annual
Up to 100 employees.
Plus
Quote
Annual
Growing companies.
Enterprise
Quote
Annual
Large organisations.
Rework (August 2026) and Yardstick (September 2026, competitor).
Prices change. Confirm current plans and terms on the vendor's site before you decide.
Visit official website (external) ↗See alternativesAshby integrations, API and platforms.
Important integrations
- Slack
- Google Workspace
- Microsoft 365
- HRIS systems
Supported platforms
- Web
- iOS
- Android
API
Not reviewed for this profile.
Data import and export
Not reviewed for this profile.
Integration coverage was not assessed in full. Check Ashby's integrations directory and documentation for your tools.
Ashby pros and cons.
Strengths, limitations and best fit. Each point cites a source; editorial summaries are not customer reviews.
Strengths
Limitations
Best for
- Fast-growing companies wanting ATS, CRM and analytics in one tool
- Data-driven recruiting ops
- Tech startups
May be less suited to
- Occasional hirers
- Very price-sensitive SMBs
Top Ashby alternatives and competitors.
Greenhouse
A structured-hiring ATS for growing and enterprise companies, with quote-based pricing estimated from…
Explore →Related productLever
An ATS combined with a recruiting CRM, priced on company headcount by quote (estimated about $12,000 a…
Explore →Related productWorkable
A self-serve ATS with published pricing: Standard from $299 a month billed annually ($360 monthly), with…
Explore →Ashby compared with similar applicant tracking systems.
Summaries come from each profile. This is a side-by-side aid, not a ranking.
| Product | Pricing model | Starting price | Free plan / trial | Published pricing | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashby | By company size | ~$300-$400/mo | Not documented | Partly | All-in-one recruiting |
| Greenhouse | Quote (annual) | ~$6,500/yr (est.) | No | No | Structured hiring |
| iCIMS | Quote + implementation | ~$30,000/yr (est.) | No | No | Large enterprises |
| JazzHR | Flat fee | $1,000/yr | Free trial | Yes | Small businesses |
| Lever | Quote by headcount | ~$12,000/yr at 200 staff (est.) | No | No | Sourcing + ATS |
| Recruitee | Quote (1-year min) | ~EUR 301/mo (est.) | Not documented | No | Collaborative hiring |
Ashby vs competitors: head-to-head comparisons.
Each comparison has a feature table, pricing side by side, strengths and limits, and best-fit scenarios.
Ashby discussions and buying questions.
No published discussions mention this product yet.
Ashby questions and answers
What is Ashby used for?
Ashby is an all-in-one recruiting platform combining applicant tracking, CRM, interview scheduling and advanced analytics, popular with fast-growing tech companies. Typical uses include applicant tracking, sourcing CRM, interview scheduling, recruiting analytics.
How much does Ashby cost?
Foundations is about $300 to $900 a month for companies up to 100 employees; larger plans are quoted.
Does Ashby include scheduling and analytics?
Yes, it combines ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics.
Does Ashby offer an annual discount?
Yes, 10% for annual commitments.
How does Ashby compare with its competitors?
Stack18 publishes head-to-head comparisons of Greenhouse vs Ashby and Lever vs Ashby, each with a feature table, pricing and best-fit scenarios.
What are the main alternatives to Ashby?
The main alternatives to Ashby covered on Stack18 are Greenhouse, Lever and Workable. Greenhouse may suit scaling companies that want structured, data-driven hiring. Lever may suit teams that source and nurture candidates proactively. Workable may suit SMBs and mid-market teams wanting a capable ATS with clear pricing. See the Ashby alternatives guide for a side-by-side table.
What are the pros and cons of Ashby?
Strengths: ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics in one. API on every tier. Limitations: Larger plans quote-only. Can be costly as teams grow.
Who is Ashby best for?
Ashby may suit fast-growing companies wanting ATS, CRM and analytics in one tool; data-driven recruiting ops; tech startups. It may be less suited to occasional hirers; very price-sensitive SMBs.
What integrations does Ashby support?
Documented integrations and ecosystem items include Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft 365, HRIS systems. API: Not reviewed for this profile.
When was the Ashby profile last verified?
Sources for this profile were last reviewed on 10 Nov 2026. 2 sources are listed under Sources, and prices and plans can change, so confirm with the vendor.
Where this information comes from.
- Best Applicant Tracking Systems in 2026 (updated 13 August 2026) Rework Third-party Accessed 10 Nov 2026
- ATS pricing comparison (terms read September 2026) Yardstick (competing vendor) Third-party Accessed 10 Nov 2026
Secondary-source profile. Vendor pages were not reviewed directly for this profile. Facts and prices are taken from independent third-party sources and may differ from the vendor's current pages. Confirm with the vendor before buying.
Facts come from Rework (August 2026) and Yardstick (a competitor). Capabilities were not tested.
Stack18 has not tested this product or received anything from the vendor for this profile. Editorial summaries of vendor information are not endorsements. Confirm details with the vendor before buying.
Evaluating Ashby?
Check the vendor's current pricing and terms, compare it with similar products, or read how others approach the decision. If off-the-shelf is not the answer, Stack18 builds around how your business works.
Logos provided by Logo.dev. Product names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners and appear for identification only; they do not imply endorsement.