Hyperproof
A compliance operations platform for multi-framework programmes with risk management, estimated from about $25,000 a year.
- Quote-based
- Annual
- Cloud
- Compliance operations
- Independent sources
- Verified 11 Nov 2026Sources are dated on this profile
- 2 sourcesLinked, typed and dated
- Independent third-party sourcesHow this profile was compiled
- Not an endorsementStack18 has not tested this product
What is Hyperproof?
Hyperproof is a compliance operations and risk management platform that maps controls across many frameworks and automates evidence collection.
- Best forOrganisations running multi-framework programmes with risk management
- Team size fitMid-size teams, Large enterprises
- PricingQuote; ~$25K/yr start; $40K-$75K mid-market; $75K+ enterprise (CostBench lists $12K-$99.7K).
- Main limitationToo much for a first SOC 2.
- AlternativesLogicGate Risk Cloud, AuditBoard, Scrut Automation · compare all
Hyperproof overview: who it is for and what it does.
Hyperproof maps controls across frameworks and connects compliance to risk management.
A June 2026 guide estimates Hyperproof from about $25,000 a year, $40,000 to $75,000 mid-market and $75,000+ enterprise; CostBench lists a $12,000 to $99,700 range.
The guide calls it too much for a startup pursuing its first SOC 2.
Main problem it solves
Runs mature, multi-framework compliance.
Typical customer segment
Mid-size and large organisations.
Target users
- Compliance managers
- Risk managers
- GRC teams
Primary use cases
- Multi-framework mapping
- Risk management
- Evidence automation
- Audits
What makes it distinct
- Control mapping.
- Risk depth.
- Higher floor.
Hyperproof features explained.
Estimates (per year)
- Start
- ~$25K.
- Mid-market
- $40K-$75K.
- Enterprise
- $75K+.
Platform
- Frameworks
- Multi-framework mapping.
- Risk
- Risk management.
- Evidence
- Automated.
Fit
- Startups
- Too much for first SOC 2.
- Mature programmes
- Strong.
- Range (CostBench)
- $12K-$99.7K.
Hyperproof pricing and plans.
Figures reported by independent sources; vendor page not reviewed directly. Checked 11 Nov 2026 against Dupple · CostBench.
Pricing model
Annual quote.
Free plan
No
Free trial
Not documented
Hyperproof plans and prices (USD)
Custom
Quote (~$25K+/yr est.)
Annual
Multi-framework.
Dupple (June 2026), estimates; CostBench (2026).
Prices change. Confirm current plans and terms on the vendor's site before you decide.
Visit official website (external) ↗See alternativesHyperproof integrations, API and platforms.
Important integrations
- Jira
- Slack
- AWS
- Okta
Supported platforms
- Web
API
Not reviewed for this profile.
Data import and export
Not reviewed for this profile.
Integration coverage was not assessed in full. Check Hyperproof's integrations directory and documentation for your tools.
Hyperproof pros and cons.
Strengths, limitations and best fit. Each point cites a source; editorial summaries are not customer reviews.
Best for
- Organisations running multi-framework programmes with risk management
- Mid-market GRC teams
- Regulated industries
May be less suited to
- Startups on first audit
- Tiny budgets
Top Hyperproof alternatives and competitors.
LogicGate Risk Cloud
A configurable GRC platform (Risk Cloud) for risk, compliance and controls, sold by custom quote with a…
Explore →Related productAuditBoard
An audit, risk and compliance platform for internal audit and SOX teams, sold by quote with a Vendr…
Explore →Related productScrut Automation
A compliance automation platform with 60+ frameworks and control reuse, estimated at $10,000 to $15,000…
Explore →Hyperproof compared with similar GRC and compliance automation software.
Summaries come from each profile. This is a side-by-side aid, not a ranking.
| Product | Pricing model | Typical annual cost | Audit bundled | Focus | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperproof | Quote | ~$25K-$75K+ (est.) | No | Compliance operations | Multi-framework |
| AuditBoard | Quote | ~$45,947 median (Vendr) | No | Audit + SOX + risk | Internal audit |
| Drata | Quote | ~$7.5K-$15K + onboarding (est.) | No | Compliance automation | Engineering-led SaaS |
| LogicGate Risk Cloud | Quote | Quote | No | Configurable GRC | Risk programmes |
| OneTrust | Quote (modules) | ~$50K-$250K+ (est.) | No | Privacy + GRC | Privacy programmes |
| Scrut Automation | Quote | ~$10K-$15K (est.) | No | Compliance automation | Many frameworks |
Hyperproof vs competitors: head-to-head comparisons.
Each comparison has a feature table, pricing side by side, strengths and limits, and best-fit scenarios.
Hyperproof vs AuditBoard
Hyperproof vs AuditBoard in 2026: pricing, free plans, features, strengths and best fit compared from dated…
Compare →ComparisonLogicGate Risk Cloud vs Hyperproof
LogicGate Risk Cloud vs Hyperproof (2026): pricing, free plans, features and best fit compared from dated…
Compare →Hyperproof discussions and buying questions.
No published discussions mention this product yet.
Hyperproof questions and answers
What is Hyperproof used for?
Hyperproof is a compliance operations and risk management platform that maps controls across many frameworks and automates evidence collection. Typical uses include multi-framework mapping, risk management, evidence automation, audits.
How much does Hyperproof cost?
A June 2026 guide estimates from about $25,000 a year, with mid-market at $40,000 to $75,000.
Is Hyperproof good for startups?
The guide says it is too much for a first SOC 2.
Does Hyperproof include risk management?
Yes.
How does Hyperproof compare with its competitors?
Stack18 publishes head-to-head comparisons of Hyperproof vs AuditBoard and LogicGate Risk Cloud vs Hyperproof, each with a feature table, pricing and best-fit scenarios.
What are the main alternatives to Hyperproof?
The main alternatives to Hyperproof covered on Stack18 are LogicGate Risk Cloud, AuditBoard and Scrut Automation. LogicGate Risk Cloud may suit GRC teams wanting configurable, no-code applications. AuditBoard may suit internal audit and SOX teams at mid-to-large enterprises. Scrut Automation may suit teams with a GRC function managing many frameworks. See the Hyperproof alternatives guide for a side-by-side table.
What are the pros and cons of Hyperproof?
Strengths: Depth for multi-framework programmes. Risk management. Limitations: Too much for a first SOC 2. Higher price floor.
Who is Hyperproof best for?
Hyperproof may suit organisations running multi-framework programmes with risk management; mid-market GRC teams; regulated industries. It may be less suited to startups on first audit; tiny budgets.
What integrations does Hyperproof support?
Documented integrations and ecosystem items include Jira, Slack, AWS, Okta. API: Not reviewed for this profile.
When was the Hyperproof profile last verified?
Sources for this profile were last reviewed on 11 Nov 2026. 2 sources are listed under Sources, and prices and plans can change, so confirm with the vendor.
Where this information comes from.
- The Best Compliance Management Software in 2026 (prices as of June 2026) Dupple Third-party Accessed 11 Nov 2026
- LogicGate Risk Cloud pricing (2026) CostBench Third-party Accessed 11 Nov 2026
Secondary-source profile. Vendor pages were not reviewed directly for this profile. Facts and prices are taken from independent third-party sources and may differ from the vendor's current pages. Confirm with the vendor before buying.
Compliance platforms are mostly quote-only; annual figures are third-party estimates (labelled) and usually exclude auditor fees. Confirm with the vendor before buying. Capabilities were not tested.
Stack18 has not tested this product or received anything from the vendor for this profile. Editorial summaries of vendor information are not endorsements. Confirm details with the vendor before buying.
Evaluating Hyperproof?
Check the vendor's current pricing and terms, compare it with similar products, or read how others approach the decision. If off-the-shelf is not the answer, Stack18 builds around how your business works.
Logos provided by Logo.dev. Product names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners and appear for identification only; they do not imply endorsement.