Comparison · Workflow Automation Software

Make vs n8n: Workflow Automation Software Compared (2026)

Make and n8n are two widely compared automation platforms. Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform where scenarios connect apps with routers, filters, iterators and AI modules. n8n is a workflow automation tool with a visual editor, code nodes and AI agent nodes, available as a self-hosted Community Edition or n8n Cloud, priced per workflow execution.

  • Verified 10 Nov 2026Sources are dated on this page
  • 3 sourcesLinked, typed and dated
  • No winner declaredFit depends on your criteria
  • Not tested by Stack18Editorial summary of documented facts
Quick answer

Make vs n8n: the short answer

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform where scenarios connect apps with routers, filters, iterators and AI modules. n8n is a workflow automation tool with a visual editor, code nodes and AI agent nodes, available as a self-hosted Community Edition or n8n Cloud, priced per workflow execution. Both are automation platforms, but they differ in pricing model, target team size and focus.

On pricing, Make is described as: monthly or annual by credits; n8n as: per execution (cloud) or free self-hosted. Both have a free option. Make lists a free option: 1,000 credits. n8n lists a free option: self-hosted. Make is positioned for teams building complex, branching automations on a budget, and n8n for technical teams wanting per-execution pricing and self-hosting.

Everything below is drawn from the two sourced profiles and the 3 dated sources listed at the end. Where a source does not document something it is marked Unknown, and third-party estimates are labelled. No winner is declared: the better fit depends on your size, budget and requirements.

Side by side

Make and n8n at a glance.

One card per product, drawn from each full profile. Open a profile for features, pricing plans, limits and sources.

Make

Make · Workflow Automation Software

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform where scenarios connect apps with routers, filters, iterators and AI modules.

Pricing
Free (1,000 credits); Core $9 (or ~$12 annual per competitor); Pro $16; Teams $29 a month (from 10,000 credits).
Best for
Teams building complex, branching automations on a budget

n8n

n8n · Workflow Automation Software

n8n is a workflow automation tool with a visual editor, code nodes and AI agent nodes, available as a self-hosted Community Edition or n8n Cloud, priced per workflow execution.

Pricing
Community Edition free (self-hosted); Cloud Starter €20 ($24) / Pro €50 ($60) / Business €667 ($800) a month by executions; 14-day Pro trial.
Best for
Technical teams wanting per-execution pricing and self-hosting
Feature comparison

Make vs n8n: feature-by-feature comparison.

Every row is drawn from the sources listed below. Rows that differ are marked, and you can filter the table to show only those.

  • YesDocumented
  • PartialAvailable with limits or on some plans
  • NoDocumented as unavailable
  • UnknownNot documented in the sources reviewed
Make compared with n8n across Product, Pricing, Workflow Automation Software criteria, Fit and platform
DimensionMaken8n
Product
Product typeDiffers YesVisual automation YesFair-code workflow automation
VendorDiffers YesMake Yesn8n
Best forDiffers YesTeams building complex, branching automations on a budget YesTechnical teams wanting per-execution pricing and self-hosting
Pricing
Pricing modelDiffers YesMonthly or annual by credits. YesPer execution (cloud) or free self-hosted.
Pricing summaryDiffers PartialFree (1,000 credits); Core $9 (or ~$12 annual per competitor); Pro $16; Teams $29 a month (from 10,000 credits). YesCommunity Edition free (self-hosted); Cloud Starter €20 ($24) / Pro €50 ($60) / Business €667 ($800) a month by executions; 14-day Pro trial.
Free planDiffers YesYes (1,000 credits) YesYes (self-hosted)
Free trialDiffers NoNot documented YesYes (14 days)
Workflow Automation Software criteria
Pricing modelDiffers YesBy credits YesBy executions
Starting priceDiffers PartialFree; ~$9/mo PartialFree (self-hosted); ~€20/mo cloud
TypeDiffers YesVisual automation YesTechnical automation
Best forDiffers YesComplex logic YesSelf-hosting + AI
Fit and platform
Team sizeDiffers YesSmall teams, Mid-size teams YesSmall teams, Mid-size teams, Large enterprises
PlatformsDiffers YesWeb YesWeb, Self-hosted
IntegrationsDiffers YesGoogle Sheets, Slack, Airtable, OpenAI YesOpenAI, Slack, Postgres, Google Sheets
API UnknownNot reviewed for this profile. UnknownNot reviewed for this profile.

Pricing

Make vs n8n pricing.

Plan names, prices and billing terms as reported in each profile's sources. Taxes, add-ons and discounts are excluded unless stated.

Make pricing

Monthly or annual by credits.

  • Free$0 · Free
  • Core$9 per month · Monthly or annual
  • Pro$16 per month · Monthly or annual
  • Teams$29 per month · Monthly or annual

Prices from independent sources; treat as reported. Dupple (June 2026); Composio (June 2026), competitor. Currency: USD. Checked 10 Nov 2026.

All Make plans and sources

n8n pricing

Per execution (cloud) or free self-hosted.

  • Community$0 · Free
  • Starter€20 per month · Monthly or annual
  • Pro€50 per month · Monthly or annual
  • Business€667 per month · Annual

Prices from independent sources; treat as reported. Dupple (June 2026); Composio (June 2026), competitor; conflicting currencies. Currency: USD. Checked 10 Nov 2026.

All n8n plans and sources
Considerations

Make vs n8n: pricing model, ecosystem and fit.

Pricing model and cost drivers

Make: monthly or annual by credits. Dupple (June 2026); Composio (June 2026), competitor. n8n: per execution (cloud) or free self-hosted. Dupple (June 2026); Composio (June 2026), competitor; conflicting currencies. Model costs at your real seat count, usage and contract term before comparing headline prices.

What sets each apart

The Make profile highlights: visual canvas; credit pricing; strong logic. The n8n profile highlights: per-execution pricing; self-hostable; fair-code licence.

Integrations and ecosystem

Make integrations named in its sources: Google Sheets, Slack, Airtable and OpenAI. n8n: OpenAI, Slack, Postgres and Google Sheets. Check that the connectors you rely on exist on the plan you would buy.

Deployment and team fit

Make runs on Web and is documented for small teams and mid-size teams. n8n runs on Web and Self-hosted and is documented for small teams, mid-size teams and large enterprises. We did not test setup or migration.

Strengths and limitations

Make and n8n: each option, in balance.

Each point is linked to a dated source on the product's profile.

Make

Strengths and limitations from the profile

Strengths
  • Visual canvas with branching.
  • Low price for the logic.
  • Free plan.
Limitations
  • Steeper learning curve.
  • Credits can go quickly.
  • Cloud-only hosting.

n8n

Strengths and limitations from the profile

Strengths
  • Per-execution pricing.
  • Open source and self-hostable.
  • Deep AI nodes.
Limitations
  • Self-hosting means maintenance.
  • Technical interface.
  • No free cloud tier.
Best-fit scenarios

Make or n8n: which fits which situation?

No overall winner is declared. The better choice depends on the criteria that matter most to you, so test both against your own requirements.

Choose Make if you are…

  • Teams building complex, branching automations on a budget
  • Agencies
  • Ops teams

Less suited to: absolute beginners; self-hosting needs.

See the Make profile

Choose n8n if you are…

  • Technical teams wanting per-execution pricing and self-hosting
  • AI agent builders
  • Privacy-sensitive organisations

Less suited to: non-technical users; teams wanting zero ops.

See the n8n profile
Switching

Switching between Make and n8n.

Moving off Make or n8n means listing every active workflow, rebuilding triggers, steps and data mappings, re-authenticating every connected app, re-creating error alerts and schedules, and running old and new automations side by side until outputs match. Retire old workflows one at a time. Rebuild your three highest-volume workflows in each shortlisted tool, run them for two weeks with real data, and compare reliability, error handling and the projected monthly bill.

General switching checklist
  1. Export a sample of your data and test an import into the other product.
  2. List the automations, integrations and permissions you would need to rebuild.
  3. Compare total cost at your real volume, including add-ons and services.
  4. Pilot with one team before a full cut-over.
  5. Check contract terms and notice periods with both vendors.

General guidance, not specific to either vendor. Confirm migration options with the vendors.

FAQ

Make vs n8n: questions and answers

What is the difference between Make and n8n?

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform where scenarios connect apps with routers, filters, iterators and AI modules. n8n is a workflow automation tool with a visual editor, code nodes and AI agent nodes, available as a self-hosted Community Edition or n8n Cloud, priced per workflow execution. Both are automation platforms, but they differ in pricing model, target team size and focus. Make is positioned for teams building complex, branching automations on a budget; n8n for technical teams wanting per-execution pricing and self-hosting.

Is Make cheaper than n8n?

It depends on your volume and plan. Make: Free (1,000 credits); Core $9 (or ~$12 annual per competitor); Pro $16; Teams $29 a month (from 10,000 credits). n8n: Community Edition free (self-hosted); Cloud Starter €20 ($24) / Pro €50 ($60) / Business €667 ($800) a month by executions; 14-day Pro trial. Compare both at your real seat count, usage and contract term.

Do Make or n8n have a free plan?

Both have a free option. Make lists a free option: 1,000 credits. n8n lists a free option: self-hosted. Make free trial: Not documented. n8n free trial: Yes (14 days).

Make or n8n: which is better for small teams?

Make and n8n are both documented for small teams. Make suits teams building complex, branching automations on a budget; n8n suits technical teams wanting per-execution pricing and self-hosting. Neither is best for everyone.

What are the main limitations of Make and n8n?

Make: Steeper learning curve. n8n: Self-hosting means maintenance.

How much does Make cost?

Core is about $9 a month (some sources say ~$12 annual), Pro $16 and Teams $29; Free includes 1,000 credits.

How much does n8n cost?

Self-hosting is free; Cloud Starter is about €20 ($24) a month for 2,500 executions, per 2026 sources.

What are the alternatives to Make and n8n?

Stack18 has alternatives guides for both: Make alternatives and n8n alternatives, each comparing at least four other automation platforms on pricing, free plan, features and fit. The Workflow Automation Software category lists every profile.

Sources and verification

Where this comparison comes from.

This comparison summarises the Make and n8n profiles and their sources. Third-party figures are labelled; confirm current pricing and terms with each vendor. Stack18 has not tested these products.

Next step

Ready to test Make and n8n?

Check each vendor's current pricing and terms, run both against a real scenario from your business, or talk to Stack18 if off-the-shelf software is not the answer.

Logos provided by Logo.dev. Product names and logos are trademarks of their respective owners and appear for identification only; they do not imply endorsement.